In the matter of
the ARBITRATION
between
ARGOSY SHIPPING S.A. ("Owners")
and
ATLANTIC GRAIN FACTORS LIMITED ("Charterers")
concerning
M.V.
"LUCKY CHARM":Charter Party dated 22 March, 2000
(A) INTRODUCTION
The "LUCKY CHARM" is a conventional single-deck bulk carrier of 19,632 DWT, built in Japan in 1976, with 5 holds / hatches and 4 cranes.
The vessel was chartered by Atlantic Grain Factors Limited ("Charterers") from Argosy Shipping S.A ("Owners") for a single voyage with a cargo of wheat in bulk from Quebec City to Tema, Ghana. The C/P, dated 22 March 2000, was on the "NORGRAIN" 1989 form, with various amendments and additional clauses.
The vessel loaded at Quebec a cargo of 17,634 metric tons without incident, and departed direct for West Africa on 15 April, 2000. It arrived off Tema on 3 May. Upon its arrival, the berth was occupied by another vessel, which departed on 8 May. "LUCKY CHARM" then moved into the berth, but was unable to commence discharge owing to non-availability of vacuvators.
Three vacuvators were supplied to the vessel on 10 May, and discharge commenced. Operations proceeded normally until 19 May, when local food riots broke out, immediately followed by a general port strike. This suspended all cargo operations for one week. Discharge was eventually resumed on 26 May and completed on the 27th.
(B) THE DISPUTE
The dispute concerns the computation of laytime at the port of discharge. According to the arbitration agreement contained in the C/P, the parties have referred the matter to arbitration in Montreal under the AMAC Rules of Procedure. Each party has nominated one member of the tribunal, and the two so appointed have selected a third member, who will also act as Chairman.
In summary, the written pleadings have submitted the following:
(a) The Claims Submission:
The Owners contend that the vessel earned demurrage of $62,213.54: see Owners’ Laytime Statement. [A]
(b) The Defence Submission:
To this claim, Charterers offer the following defence and counterclaim:
(i) The notice tendered by the Master on 3 May was not a contractual Notice of Readiness ("NOR"), but a mere notification of arrival. In order to present a valid NOR, the vessel had to be ready for discharge in all respects; but the vessel was not ready, because it did not have on board the minimum number of vacuvators (5) as expressly stipulated in the C/P. Since no valid NOR was ever tendered, laytime could only start to run at the moment when discharge commenced.
(ii) Further, the Owners’ failure to provide the minimum 5 vacuvators as expressly required by Clause 52 was a breach: had 5 units been provided, the discharge would have ended proportionately sooner, so that the Charterers’ despatch earnings would have been increased. Applying the principle of Clause 22 of the C/P, Charterers calculate that they are entitled to payment of despatch in an amount of $30,328.13: see Charterers’ Laytime Statement. [B]
(c) The Owners’ Reply to the Defence & Counterclaim:
To this counterclaim, Owners offer the following reply:
(i) As to the validity of the NOR, the provision of the vacuvators was not a condition precedent for the tender of a valid NOR. Except for the vacuvators, which could not be obtained prior to berthing, the vessel was arrived and ready at the anchorage; and in the absence of an available berth, NOR could therefore be tendered at that point. The failure to provide sufficient vacuvators upon arrival at the berth might or might not be a breach on the part of the Owners; but it was completely irrelevant to the presentation of a valid NOR.
(ii) With regard to their failure to provide more than 3 vacuvators during the discharge, Owners contend that this was not a breach; but if it was a breach, it was a mere technical breach, resulting in no more than nominal damages. The basic obligation which the C/P placed upon the Owners was to provide sufficient vacuvators to discharge the vessel within the allowed laytime; and this they had done, as evidenced by the fact that the time actually taken for the physical discharge (i.e. after deducting idle periods) was less than the laytime.
The overall scheme of the C/P was plainly designed to ensure that the Charterers would not be prevented from discharging the vessel at the rate implied by the laytime, and the reference to "minimum five" vacuvators was in effect a mere gloss based on a non-binding estimate made during the negotiation of the charter agreement.
(iii) If it should be found that the failure to provide 5 vacuvators was more than a mere technical breach, Owners contend that the method of calculation used by Charterers is not correct, for two reasons: (a) the proper approach should be to adjust the time used, not the time allowed; and (b) the proportional adjustment should apply only to the time used because, when no work was being done, no time was being lost. The Charterers’ counterclaim is therefore incorrectly formulated, and the counterclaim should, on any analysis, be adjusted to despatch of $14,981.77: see Owners’ Restatement of Charterers’ Laytime Statement. [C]
(iv) Owners further contend that, in any event, Charterers suffered no loss or damage through the lack of vacuvators because they could not have provided additional trucks to receive the cargo at any greater rate of discharge.
(v) Owners further reply that their inability to provide 5 vacuvators upon berthing was in any case a direct result of the intervention of the Receivers, for whose actions Charterers must remain responsible. There existed a close business (and family) relationship between the Receivers and the only supplier of vacuvators at Tema, and the Receivers had, quite deliberately, so arranged matters that Owners could obtain no more than 3 vacuvators. Clause 20 of the C/P clearly provides that any loss of time for which Charterers / Receivers are responsible is to count as laytime or time on demurrage.
(d) The Charterers’ Reply to the Owners’ Reply:
To the Owners’ Reply, Charterers respond as follows:
(i) A breach is a breach. Owners expressly undertook to provide 5 vacuvators, and failed to do so. Charterers are accordingly entitled to damages for their loss and damages are intended to place the injured party in the same position as if the breach had not occurred. If Owners had provided the full number of vacuvators stipulated in the C/P, the discharge would have been completed that much earlier; and Clause 22 was intended to, and did, provide a simple and workable method to calculate the Charterers’ loss.
(ii) Owners’ argument that the Receivers could not have provided sufficient trucks to keep pace with 5 vacuvators is unsound both in fact and in law. As a matter of fact, there had been no delays due to lack of trucks, and no evidence in the Statement of Facts to suggest that Receivers could not have provided more as required. As a matter of construction, the proportional adjustment of laytime specified in Clause 22 was effectively a liquidated damages provision of automatic application, regardless of whether it actually under- or over-compensated the Charterers’ actual losses.
(iii) With regard to the claim of collusion between the Receivers and the supplier of vacuvators, Charterers admit that there is only one supplier of vacuvators in Tema; but they deny the existence of the relationship as alleged by Owners. They further argue that, even if the Receivers did influence the availability of the vacuvators, that was a matter to be addressed between the Owners, the Receivers and the supplier: it was, both as a matter of fact and as a matter of law, nothing to do with the Charterers.
(e) The Common Ground between the Parties:
In the interest of saving time and costs, the parties have notified the tribunal that they are in agreement on the following points:
(i) the anchorage is within the Tema port limits;
(ii) subject only to the issue of the vacuvators, the notice tendered on 3 May was otherwise a valid NOR which should trigger the running of laytime as per Owners’ Laytime Statement [A];
(iii) if the notice tendered on 3 May is found not to have been a valid NOR, then laytime should properly commence as at the commencement of discharge, as per Charterers’ Laytime Statement [B];
(iv) the vessel was, as a matter of fact, quite capable of discharging the cargo within the laytime using only 3 vacuvators;
(v) if the failure to provide more than 3 vacuvators was more than a mere technical breach, Clause 22 provides the proper mechanism for the calculation of Charterers’ damages; and
(vi) the strike which occurred between 19 and 26 May is such as should properly interrupt laytime, but not demurrage.
(f) Agreed Questions for the Tribunal:
Rather than have the arbitrators spend their time in preparing detailed laytime calculations, the parties have requested the tribunal to issue an interim final award which will provide the answers to the four specific questions. Even if the answer to Question (2) is: "None", the tribunal has been requested to provide answers to Questions (3) and (4).
The four questions for the tribunal are the following:
(1) Was the notice given on 3 May a valid Notice of Readiness?
(2) What obligation (if any) did Clause 52 impose on the Owners beyond the requirement to provide sufficient vacuvator capacity physically to discharge the vessel at the C/P rate of discharge?
(3) If Clause 52 did require Owners to provide a minimum of 5 vacuvators, then which is the correct application of the mechanism of Clause 22: Charterers’ [B] or Owners’ [C]?
(4) Are the Charterers responsible for the Owners’ failure to supply 5 vacuvators for the discharge?
(C) THE HEARING
The Charterers have indicated that they are content to have the dispute decided upon documents alone, but with an oral hearing for presentation of argument.
The Owners have notified the tribunal that they intend to call one witness of fact, the Master of the vessel. The matters to be addressed by his testimony are indicated in his statement. [D]
(D) THE TERMS OF THE C/P
The main terms of the C/P which are relevant to this dispute include the following (amendments and additions to the basic printed form shown in bold type):
10(a) … Cargo is to be discharged free of expense to the vessel …
In all cases, stevedores shall be deemed to be the servants of the Owners and shall work under the supervision of the Master.
18(a) Notification of vessel’s readiness to load and discharge at the first or sole loading and discharging port shall be delivered in writing (including radio message) at the offices of Charterers / Receivers between 0900 and 1700 on all days except Sundays and holidays, and between 0900 and 1200 on Saturdays. Such notice of readiness shall be delivered when vessel is in the loading or discharging berth if vacant, failing which from a lay berth or anchorage within limits of the port...
(c) Following receipt of notice of readiness laytime will commence at 0800 on the next day not excepted from laytime unless sooner commenced....
19(c) Vessel is to be discharged at the average rate of 1,750 metric tons ... per weather working day of twenty-four (24) consecutive hours (weather permitting), Saturdays after noon, Sundays and Holidays excepted on the basis of the Bill of Lading weight.
(d) ... Laytime non-reversible.
Any time lost for which Charterers / Receivers are responsible, which is not excepted under this Charterparty, shall count as laytime, until same has expired, thence time on demurrage.
21(a)(iii) If the vessel shifts from the anchorage or waiting place outside the port limits either directly to the first loading or discharging berth or to a lay berth or anchorage within the port limits the cost of that shifting shall be for Owners’ account and time so used shall not count even if vessel is on demurrage.
(iv) Cost of shifting from lay berth or anchorage within the port limits to first loading or first discharging berth to be for Owners’ account, time not counting.
22 If required, the Master to give free use of vessel’s cargo gear, and/or discharge equipment, also including runners, ropes and slings as on board, and power to operate the same.... Time lost pro rata to the number of gear / equipment inoperative or unavailable whether on account of breakdowns or non-availability of vessel’s gear essential to the loading or discharging of this cargo is not to count as laytime or time on demurrage …
30 … or if the cargo cannot be discharged by reason of Riots, Civil Commotions, or of a Strike or Lock-out of any class of workmen essential to the discharge, the time for … discharging …. shall not count during the continuance of such causes, … In case of any delay by reason of the before mentioned causes, no claim for damages or demurrage shall be made by the Charterers / Receivers of the cargo or Owners of the vessel. For the purpose, however, of settling despatch rebate accounts, any time lost by the vessel through any of the above causes shall be counted s time used in the loading, or discharging, as the case may be.
45(b) … All disputes arising out of this contract shall be arbitrated at London Montreal and, unless the parties agree forthwith on a single Arbitrator, be referred to the final arbitrament of two Arbitrators … one to be appointed by each of the parties, with a third to be selected by the two so appointed, who shall act as Chairman of the Tribunal. Such arbitration to be conducted in accordance with the Rules of Procedure of The Association of Maritime Arbitrators of Canada. … Any disputes arising hereunder shall be governed by English Law. Canadian Maritime Law and the laws of the province of Quebec as they may apply.
52 Owners acknowledge that discharge to be effected by vacuvators to be obtained locally at discharge port and undertake to rent and to supply sufficient (but always minimum 5 units) vacuvators together with power to operate same capable of discharging at charter-party rate of discharge. All costs to be for Owners’ account.
NOTICE OF READINESS
M.V. "LUCKY CHARM" PORT OF TEMA, GHANA
DATE: 3 MAY 2000
TO: MESSRS FATIMA BIBI & CO
COPY: MESSRS GOLDEN GAIN AGENCY (as agents only)
DEAR SIRS:
THIS IS TO ADVISE YOU THAT THE ABOVE VESSEL UNDER MY COMMAND ARRIVED AT THE PORT OF TEMA, GHANA AT 1115 HOURS LOCAL TIME TODAY, 3RD MAY 2000, AND IS IN ALL RESPECTS READY TO COMMENCE DISCHARGING ABOUT 17,634 METRIC TONS OF CANADIAN WHEAT IN BULK ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CHARTER PARTY DATED 22 MARCH 2000 AT MONTREAL.
THIS IS A WRITTEN CONFIRMATION OF NOTICE OF READINESS TRANSMITTED TO YOU BY RADIO AT 1115 HOURS TODAY, RECEIPT OF WHICH YOU HAVE ACKNOWLEDGED.
YOURS FAITHFULLY,
ALESSANDRO GIANCOMETTI,
MASTER
NOTICE OF READINESS ACCEPTED TODAY, 3 MAY 2000, AT 1115 HOURS, BUT ALWAYS SUBJECT TO PROOF THAT VESSEL IS IN EVERY WAY READY AND FIT FOR DISCHARGE AS PER C/P
FATIMA BIBI & CO
per
DIOGENES LAERTES BIBI,Managing Director
STATEMENT OF FACTS
m.v. LUCKY CHARM Discharging 17,634 MT Canadian Wheat at
Tin Pot Wharf, TEMA, Ghana
________________________________________________________________
Arrived/anchored 1115 hours 3 May, 2000
Notice of Readiness tendered 1115 hours 3 May, 2000
Berth available 1610 hours 8 May, 2000
Weighed anchor 1630 hours 8 May, 2000
Berthed Tin Pot Wharf 1830 hours 8 May, 2000
Free Patique granted 1920 hours 8 May, 2000
Commenced discharge 0915 hours 10 May, 2000
Completed discharge 0940 hours 27 May, 2000
Departed berth 1150 hours 27 May, 2000
______________________________________________________________________________________
WORKING LOG
|
Day |
Date |
Time |
Event |
|
Wednesday |
3/5/00 |
1115 |
Vessel anchored: berth occupied by m.v. "FIDELIO" |
|
|
|
1115 |
Notice of Readiness tendered |
|
Thursday |
4/5/00 |
|
At anchor |
|
Friday |
5/5/00 |
|
At anchor |
|
Saturday |
6/5/00 |
|
At anchor |
|
Sunday |
7/5/00 |
|
At anchor |
|
Monday |
8/5/00 |
1550 |
Pilot on board |
|
|
|
1610 |
m.v. "FIDELIO" departed berth |
|
|
|
1630 |
Weighed anchor |
|
|
|
1830 |
All fast alongside berth |
|
|
|
1920 |
Free Pratique granted |
|
Tuesday |
9/5/00 |
|
At berth: no discharge due to lack of vacuvators |
|
Wednesday |
10/5/00 |
0805 |
3 vacuvators received on board |
|
0915 |
Vacuvators ready: commenced discharge |
||
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
||
|
1930 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
Thursday |
11/5/00 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
|
0730 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
||
|
1930 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
Friday |
12/5/00 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
|
0730 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
||
|
1930 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
Saturday |
13/5/00 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
|
0730 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
||
|
Sunday |
14/5/00 |
0800 |
Resumed discharge |
|
1700 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
||
|
Monday |
15/5/00 |
0730 |
Resumed discharge |
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
||
|
1930 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
Tuesday |
16/5/00 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
|
0730 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
||
|
1930 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
Wednesday |
17/5/00 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
|
0730 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
||
|
1930 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
Thursday |
18/5/00 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
|
0730 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
||
|
1930 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
Friday |
19/5/00 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
|
0730 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
1630 |
Discharge suspended (strike) |
||
|
Saturday |
20/5/00 |
No work: strike |
|
|
Sunday |
21/5/00 |
No work: strike |
|
|
Monday |
22/5/00 |
No work: strike |
|
|
Tuesday |
23/5/00 |
No work: strike |
|
|
Wednesday |
24/5/00 |
No work: strike |
|
|
Thursday |
25/5/00 |
No work: strike |
|
|
Friday |
26/5/00 |
1200 |
Strike ended: discharge resumed |
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
||
|
1930 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
Saturday |
27/5/00 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended (end of shift) |
|
0730 |
Resumed discharge |
||
|
0940 |
Discharge completed |
||
|
1130 |
Pilot on board |
||
|
1150 |
Left berth |
Note:
Normal working hours
Day Shift: 0730 - 1800 Saturday: 1200 - 1800
Night Shift: 1930 - 0330 Sunday/holiday: 0800 - 1700
Saturday: 0730 - 1200
Signed / accepted:
Alessandro T. B. di GiancomettiMaster
Diogenes Laertes Bibi
Coriolanus SmithFatima Bibi & Co. Golden Gain Agency
(Receiver) (Agent)
Tema, 27 May 2000
[A]
OWNERS’ LAYTIME STATEMENT
m.v. "LUCKY CHARM"
Discharge at Tema
|
Day / Date |
Time |
|
Time to count |
Laytime used |
Demurrage |
|
Wed. 3/5 |
1115 |
Vessel arrived, tendered NOR |
0 - 00 - 00 |
0 - 00 - 00 |
|
|
Thurs. 4/5 |
0800 |
Laytime commences |
0 - 16 - 00 |
0 - 16 - 00 |
|
|
Fri. 5/5 |
|
|
1 - 00 - 00 |
1 - 16 - 00 |
|
|
Sat. 6/5 |
|
|
0 - 12 - 00 |
2 - 04 - 00 |
|
|
Sun. 7/5 |
|
|
0 - 00 - 00 |
2 - 04 - 00 |
|
|
Mon. 8/5 |
1630 |
Commenced shifting |
0 - 16 - 30 |
2 - 20 - 30 |
|
|
|
1830 |
Berthed, awaiting vacuvators |
0 - 00 - 00 |
2 - 20 - 30 |
|
|
Tues. 9/5 |
|
Awaiting vacuvators |
0 - 00 - 00 |
2 - 20 - 30 |
|
|
Wed. 10/5 |
0915 |
Commenced discharge |
0 - 14 - 45 |
3 - 11 - 15 |
|
|
Thurs. 11/5 |
|
|
1 - 00 - 00 |
4 - 11 - 15 |
|
|
Fri. 12/5 |
|
|
1 - 00 - 00 |
5 - 11 - 15 |
|
|
Sat. 13/5 |
|
|
0 - 12 - 00 |
5 - 23 - 15 |
|
|
Sun. 14/5 |
|
|
0 - 00 - 00 |
5 - 23 - 15 |
|
|
Mon. 15/5 |
|
|
1 - 00 - 00 |
6 - 23 - 15 |
|
|
Tues. 16/5 |
|
|
1 - 00 - 00 |
7 - 23 - 15 |
|
|
Wed. 17/5 |
|
|
1 - 00 - 00 |
8 - 23 - 15 |
|
|
Thurs. 18/5 |
1 - 00 - 00 |
9 - 23 - 15 |
|||
|
Fri. 19/5 |
0235 |
Laytime expires |
0 - 02 - 35 |
10 - 01 - 50 |
|
|
0235 |
Vessel on demurrage |
0 - 21 - 25 |
0 - 21 - 25 |
||
|
Sat. 20/5 |
1 - 00 - 00 |
1 - 21 - 25 |
|||
|
Sun. 21/5 |
1 - 00 - 00 |
2 - 21 - 25 |
|||
|
Mon. 22/5 |
1 - 00 - 00 |
3 - 21 - 25 |
|||
|
Tues. 23/5 |
1 - 00 - 00 |
4 - 21 - 25 |
|||
|
Wed. 24/5 |
1 - 00 - 00 |
5 - 21 - 25 |
|||
|
Thurs. 25/5 |
1 - 00 - 00 |
6 - 21 - 25 |
|||
|
Fri. 26/5 |
1 - 00 - 00 |
7 - 21 - 25 |
|||
|
Sat. 27/5 |
0940 |
Discharge completed |
0 - 09 - 40 |
8 - 07 - 05 |
Cargo: 17,634 metric tons
Terms: 1,750 MT/ WWD SHEX (also Saturday p.m. excluded)
Time allowed: 17,634 metric tons = 10.076571 days = 10 days 1 hour 50 minutes
1,750 metric tons / day
Demurrage
(due Owners): 8.295139 days @ $7,500 / day = $62,213.54[B]
CHARTERERS’ LAYTIME STATEMENT
m.v. "LUCKY CHARM"
Discharge at Tema
|
Day / Date |
Time |
|
Time to count |
Laytime used |
|
Wed. 10/5 |
0915 |
Commenced discharge |
0 - 14 - 45 |
0 - 14 - 45 |
|
Thurs. 11/5 |
|
|
1 - 00 - 00 |
1 - 14 - 45 |
|
Fri. 12/5 |
|
|
1 - 00 - 00 |
2 - 14 - 45 |
|
Sat. 13/5 |
|
|
0 - 12 - 00 |
3 - 02 - 45 |
|
Sun. 14/5 |
|
|
0 - 00 - 00 |
3 - 02 - 45 |
|
Mon. 15/5 |
|
|
1 - 00 - 00 |
4 - 02 - 45 |
|
Tues. 16/5 |
|
|
1 - 00 - 00 |
5 - 02 - 45 |
|
Wed. 17/5 |
|
|
1 - 00 - 00 |
6 - 02 - 45 |
|
Thurs. 18/5 |
1 - 00 - 00 |
7 - 02 - 45 |
||
|
Fri. 19/5 |
1630 |
Work suspended: strike |
0 - 16 - 30 |
7 - 19 - 15 |
|
Sat. 20/5 |
Work suspended: strike |
0 - 00 - 00 |
7 - 19 - 15 |
|
|
Sun. 21/5 |
Work suspended: strike |
0 - 00 - 00 |
7 - 19 - 15 |
|
|
Mon. 22/5 |
Work suspended: strike |
0 - 00 - 00 |
7 - 19 - 15 |
|
|
Tues. 23/5 |
Work suspended: strike |
0 - 00 - 00 |
7 - 19 - 15 |
|
|
Wed. 24/5 |
Work suspended: strike |
0 - 00 - 00 |
7 - 19 - 15 |
|
|
Thurs. 25/5 |
Work suspended: strike |
0 - 00 - 00 |
7 - 19 - 15 |
|
|
Fri. 26/5 |
1200 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 12 - 00 |
8 - 07 - 15 |
|
Sat. 27/5 |
0940 |
Discharge completed |
0 - 09 - 40 |
8 - 16 - 55 |
Time allowed: 17,634 / 1,750 = 10.076571 days
Adjust for 3 / 5 vacuvators available for discharge: 10.076571 x 5/3 = 16.794286 days
Adjusted laytime allowed = 16 days 19 hours 1 minute
Less laytime actually used 8 days 16 hours 55 minutes
Laytime saved = 8 days 2 hours 6 minutes
Despatch
(due Charterers): 8.0875 days @ $3,750 = $30,328.13
[C]
OWNERS’ RESTATEMENT OF
CHARTERERS’ LAYTIME STATEMENT
(Made Without Prejudice to Owners’ Main Argument)
m.v. "LUCKY CHARM"
Discharge at Tema
|
Day / Date |
Time |
|
Time to count |
Adjusted * time to count |
Laytime used |
|
Wed. 10/5 |
0915 |
Commenced discharge |
|||
|
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 08 - 45 |
0 - 05 - 15 |
0 - 05 - 15 |
|
|
1930 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 01 - 30 |
0 - 01 - 30 |
0 - 06 - 45 |
|
|
2400 |
|
0 - 04 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 42 |
0 - 09 - 27 |
|
Thurs. 11/5 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 03 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 06 |
0 - 11 - 33 |
|
|
0730 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 04 - 00 |
0 - 04 - 00 |
0 - 15 - 33 |
|
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 10 - 30 |
0 - 06 - 18 |
0 - 21 - 51 |
|
|
1930 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 01 - 30 |
0 - 01 - 30 |
0 - 23 - 21 |
|
|
2400 |
|
0 - 04 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 42 |
1 - 02 - 03 |
|
Fri. 12/5 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 03 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 06 |
1 - 04 - 09 |
|
|
0730 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 04 - 00 |
0 - 04 - 00 |
1 - 08 - 09 |
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 10 - 30 |
0 - 06 - 18 |
1 - 14 - 27 |
|
|
|
1930 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 01 - 30 |
0 - 01 - 30 |
1 - 15 - 57 |
|
|
2400 |
|
0 - 04 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 42 |
1 - 18 - 39 |
|
Sat. 13/5 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 03 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 06 |
1 - 20 - 45 |
|
0730 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 04 - 00 |
0 - 04 - 00 |
2 - 00 - 45 |
|
|
|
1200 |
Saturday p.m. excepted |
0 - 04 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 42 |
2 - 03 - 27 |
|
Sun. 14/5 |
|
Sunday excepted |
0 - 00 - 00 |
0 - 00 - 00 |
2 - 03 - 27 |
|
Mon. 15/5 |
0730 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 07 - 30 |
0 - 07 - 30 |
2 - 10 - 57 |
|
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 10 - 30 |
0 - 06 - 18 |
2 - 17 - 15 |
|
|
1930 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 01 - 30 |
0 - 01 - 30 |
2 - 18 - 45 |
|
|
2400 |
|
0 - 04 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 42 |
2 - 21 - 27 |
|
Tues. 16/5 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 03 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 06 |
2 - 23 - 33 |
|
0730 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 04 - 00 |
0 - 04 - 00 |
3 - 03 - 33 |
|
|
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 10 - 30 |
0 - 06 - 18 |
3 - 09 - 51 |
|
1930 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 01 - 30 |
0 - 01 - 30 |
3 - 11 - 21 |
|
|
|
2400 |
|
0 - 04 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 42 |
3 - 14 - 03 |
|
Wed. 17/5 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 03 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 06 |
3 - 16 - 09 |
|
0730 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 04 - 00 |
0 - 04 - 00 |
3 - 20 - 09 |
|
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 10 - 30 |
0 - 06 - 18 |
4 - 02 - 27 |
|
|
1930 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 01 - 30 |
0 - 01 - 30 |
4 - 03 - 57 |
|
|
2400 |
0 - 04 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 42 |
4 - 06 - 39 |
||
|
Thurs. 18/5 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 03 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 06 |
4 - 08 - 45 |
|
0730 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 04 - 00 |
0 - 04 - 00 |
4 - 12 - 45 |
|
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 10 - 30 |
0 - 06 - 18 |
4 - 19 - 03 |
|
|
1930 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 01 - 30 |
0 - 01 - 30 |
4 - 20 - 33 |
|
|
2400 |
0 - 04 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 42 |
4 - 23 - 15 |
||
|
Fri. 19/5 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 03 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 06 |
5 - 01 - 21 |
|
0730 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 04 - 00 |
0 - 04 - 00 |
5 - 05 - 21 |
|
|
1630 |
Work suspended: strike |
0 - 09 - 00 |
0 - 05 - 24 |
5 - 10 - 45 |
|
|
Sat. 20/5 |
No work: strike |
0 - 00 - 00 |
0 - 00 - 00 |
5 - 10 - 45 |
|
|
Sun. 21/5 |
No work: strike |
0 - 00 - 00 |
0 - 00 - 00 |
5 - 10 - 45 |
|
|
Mon. 22/5 |
No work: strike |
0 - 00 - 00 |
0 - 00 - 00 |
5 - 10 - 45 |
|
|
Tues. 23/5 |
No work: strike |
0 - 00 - 00 |
0 - 00 - 00 |
5 - 10 - 45 |
|
|
Wed. 24/5 |
No work: strike |
0 - 00 - 00 |
0 - 00 - 00 |
5 - 10 - 45 |
|
|
Thurs. 25/5 |
No work: strike |
0 - 00 - 00 |
0 - 00 - 00 |
5 - 10 - 45 |
|
|
Fri. 26/5 |
1200 |
Discharge resumed |
|||
|
1800 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 06 - 00 |
0 - 03 - 36 |
5 - 14 - 21 |
|
|
1930 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 01 - 30 |
0 - 01 - 30 |
5 - 15 - 51 |
|
|
2400 |
0 - 04 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 42 |
5 - 18 - 33 |
||
|
Sat. 27/5 |
0330 |
Discharge suspended |
0 - 03 - 30 |
0 - 02 - 06 |
5 - 20 - 39 |
|
0730 |
Discharge resumed |
0 - 04 - 00 |
0 - 04 - 00 |
6 - 00 - 39 |
|
|
0940 |
Discharge completed |
0 - 02 - 10 |
0 - 01 - 18 |
6 - 01 - 57 |
|
|
* Time used x 3 / 5 |
|||||
Time allowed: 10 days 1 hour 50 minutes
Adjusted time used: 6 days 1 hour 57minutes
Laytime saved: 3 days 23 hours 53 minutes
Despatch (due Charterers): 3.995139 days @ $3,750 = $ 14,981.77
[D]
WITNESS STATEMENT
Captain Alessandro Tullio Buonamente di Giancometti will swear and state as follows:
My age is 42 years. I first obtained my Master’s foreign-going licence in 1985.
Signed:
Alessandro T. B. di Giancometti (Master Mariner)Witness:
Clodia Desdemona Martucci (Secretary)Naples, 21 April, 2001