In the matter of

 

the ARBITRATION

 

between

 

ARGOSY SHIPPING S.A. ("Owners")

 

and

 

ATLANTIC GRAIN FACTORS LIMITED ("Charterers")

 

concerning

 

M.V. "LUCKY CHARM":

Charter Party dated 22 March, 2000

(A) INTRODUCTION

The "LUCKY CHARM" is a conventional single-deck bulk carrier of 19,632 DWT, built in Japan in 1976, with 5 holds / hatches and 4 cranes.

The vessel was chartered by Atlantic Grain Factors Limited ("Charterers") from Argosy Shipping S.A ("Owners") for a single voyage with a cargo of wheat in bulk from Quebec City to Tema, Ghana. The C/P, dated 22 March 2000, was on the "NORGRAIN" 1989 form, with various amendments and additional clauses.

The vessel loaded at Quebec a cargo of 17,634 metric tons without incident, and departed direct for West Africa on 15 April, 2000. It arrived off Tema on 3 May. Upon its arrival, the berth was occupied by another vessel, which departed on 8 May. "LUCKY CHARM" then moved into the berth, but was unable to commence discharge owing to non-availability of vacuvators.

Three vacuvators were supplied to the vessel on 10 May, and discharge commenced. Operations proceeded normally until 19 May, when local food riots broke out, immediately followed by a general port strike. This suspended all cargo operations for one week. Discharge was eventually resumed on 26 May and completed on the 27th.

 

(B) THE DISPUTE

The dispute concerns the computation of laytime at the port of discharge. According to the arbitration agreement contained in the C/P, the parties have referred the matter to arbitration in Montreal under the AMAC Rules of Procedure. Each party has nominated one member of the tribunal, and the two so appointed have selected a third member, who will also act as Chairman.

In summary, the written pleadings have submitted the following:

 

(a) The Claims Submission:

The Owners contend that the vessel earned demurrage of $62,213.54: see Owners’ Laytime Statement. [A]

 

(b) The Defence Submission:

To this claim, Charterers offer the following defence and counterclaim:

(i) The notice tendered by the Master on 3 May was not a contractual Notice of Readiness ("NOR"), but a mere notification of arrival. In order to present a valid NOR, the vessel had to be ready for discharge in all respects; but the vessel was not ready, because it did not have on board the minimum number of vacuvators (5) as expressly stipulated in the C/P. Since no valid NOR was ever tendered, laytime could only start to run at the moment when discharge commenced.

(ii) Further, the Owners’ failure to provide the minimum 5 vacuvators as expressly required by Clause 52 was a breach: had 5 units been provided, the discharge would have ended proportionately sooner, so that the Charterers’ despatch earnings would have been increased. Applying the principle of Clause 22 of the C/P, Charterers calculate that they are entitled to payment of despatch in an amount of $30,328.13: see Charterers’ Laytime Statement. [B]

 

(c) The Owners’ Reply to the Defence & Counterclaim:

To this counterclaim, Owners offer the following reply:

(i) As to the validity of the NOR, the provision of the vacuvators was not a condition precedent for the tender of a valid NOR. Except for the vacuvators, which could not be obtained prior to berthing, the vessel was arrived and ready at the anchorage; and in the absence of an available berth, NOR could therefore be tendered at that point. The failure to provide sufficient vacuvators upon arrival at the berth might or might not be a breach on the part of the Owners; but it was completely irrelevant to the presentation of a valid NOR.

(ii) With regard to their failure to provide more than 3 vacuvators during the discharge, Owners contend that this was not a breach; but if it was a breach, it was a mere technical breach, resulting in no more than nominal damages. The basic obligation which the C/P placed upon the Owners was to provide sufficient vacuvators to discharge the vessel within the allowed laytime; and this they had done, as evidenced by the fact that the time actually taken for the physical discharge (i.e. after deducting idle periods) was less than the laytime.

The overall scheme of the C/P was plainly designed to ensure that the Charterers would not be prevented from discharging the vessel at the rate implied by the laytime, and the reference to "minimum five" vacuvators was in effect a mere gloss based on a non-binding estimate made during the negotiation of the charter agreement.

(iii) If it should be found that the failure to provide 5 vacuvators was more than a mere technical breach, Owners contend that the method of calculation used by Charterers is not correct, for two reasons: (a) the proper approach should be to adjust the time used, not the time allowed; and (b) the proportional adjustment should apply only to the time used because, when no work was being done, no time was being lost. The Charterers’ counterclaim is therefore incorrectly formulated, and the counterclaim should, on any analysis, be adjusted to despatch of $14,981.77: see Owners’ Restatement of Charterers’ Laytime Statement. [C]

(iv) Owners further contend that, in any event, Charterers suffered no loss or damage through the lack of vacuvators because they could not have provided additional trucks to receive the cargo at any greater rate of discharge.

(v) Owners further reply that their inability to provide 5 vacuvators upon berthing was in any case a direct result of the intervention of the Receivers, for whose actions Charterers must remain responsible. There existed a close business (and family) relationship between the Receivers and the only supplier of vacuvators at Tema, and the Receivers had, quite deliberately, so arranged matters that Owners could obtain no more than 3 vacuvators. Clause 20 of the C/P clearly provides that any loss of time for which Charterers / Receivers are responsible is to count as laytime or time on demurrage.

 

(d) The Charterers’ Reply to the Owners’ Reply:

To the Owners’ Reply, Charterers respond as follows:

(i) A breach is a breach. Owners expressly undertook to provide 5 vacuvators, and failed to do so. Charterers are accordingly entitled to damages for their loss and damages are intended to place the injured party in the same position as if the breach had not occurred. If Owners had provided the full number of vacuvators stipulated in the C/P, the discharge would have been completed that much earlier; and Clause 22 was intended to, and did, provide a simple and workable method to calculate the Charterers’ loss.

(ii) Owners’ argument that the Receivers could not have provided sufficient trucks to keep pace with 5 vacuvators is unsound both in fact and in law. As a matter of fact, there had been no delays due to lack of trucks, and no evidence in the Statement of Facts to suggest that Receivers could not have provided more as required. As a matter of construction, the proportional adjustment of laytime specified in Clause 22 was effectively a liquidated damages provision of automatic application, regardless of whether it actually under- or over-compensated the Charterers’ actual losses.

(iii) With regard to the claim of collusion between the Receivers and the supplier of vacuvators, Charterers admit that there is only one supplier of vacuvators in Tema; but they deny the existence of the relationship as alleged by Owners. They further argue that, even if the Receivers did influence the availability of the vacuvators, that was a matter to be addressed between the Owners, the Receivers and the supplier: it was, both as a matter of fact and as a matter of law, nothing to do with the Charterers.

 

(e) The Common Ground between the Parties:

In the interest of saving time and costs, the parties have notified the tribunal that they are in agreement on the following points:

(i) the anchorage is within the Tema port limits;

(ii) subject only to the issue of the vacuvators, the notice tendered on 3 May was otherwise a valid NOR which should trigger the running of laytime as per Owners’ Laytime Statement [A];

(iii) if the notice tendered on 3 May is found not to have been a valid NOR, then laytime should properly commence as at the commencement of discharge, as per Charterers’ Laytime Statement [B];

(iv) the vessel was, as a matter of fact, quite capable of discharging the cargo within the laytime using only 3 vacuvators;

(v) if the failure to provide more than 3 vacuvators was more than a mere technical breach, Clause 22 provides the proper mechanism for the calculation of Charterers’ damages; and

(vi) the strike which occurred between 19 and 26 May is such as should properly interrupt laytime, but not demurrage.

 

(f) Agreed Questions for the Tribunal:

Rather than have the arbitrators spend their time in preparing detailed laytime calculations, the parties have requested the tribunal to issue an interim final award which will provide the answers to the four specific questions. Even if the answer to Question (2) is: "None", the tribunal has been requested to provide answers to Questions (3) and (4).

The four questions for the tribunal are the following:

 

 

(1) Was the notice given on 3 May a valid Notice of Readiness?

(2) What obligation (if any) did Clause 52 impose on the Owners beyond the requirement to provide sufficient vacuvator capacity physically to discharge the vessel at the C/P rate of discharge?

(3) If Clause 52 did require Owners to provide a minimum of 5 vacuvators, then which is the correct application of the mechanism of Clause 22: Charterers’ [B] or Owners’ [C]?

(4) Are the Charterers responsible for the Owners’ failure to supply 5 vacuvators for the discharge?

 

(C) THE HEARING

The Charterers have indicated that they are content to have the dispute decided upon documents alone, but with an oral hearing for presentation of argument.

The Owners have notified the tribunal that they intend to call one witness of fact, the Master of the vessel. The matters to be addressed by his testimony are indicated in his statement. [D]

(D) THE TERMS OF THE C/P

The main terms of the C/P which are relevant to this dispute include the following (amendments and additions to the basic printed form shown in bold type):

  1. On being so loaded, the vessel shall proceed to Tema, Ghana as ordered by Charterers, and deliver the cargo, according to Bills of Lading at one / two always accessible safe discharging berths in Charterers’ option, vessel being always afloat on having been paid freight as per Clauses 8 and 9.

10(a) … Cargo is to be discharged free of expense to the vessel …

  1. … Stevedores at discharging port(s) are to be appointed and paid for by Charterers*/Receivers*. (*Delete as appropriate).

In all cases, stevedores shall be deemed to be the servants of the Owners and shall work under the supervision of the Master.

18(a) Notification of vessel’s readiness to load and discharge at the first or sole loading and discharging port shall be delivered in writing (including radio message) at the offices of Charterers / Receivers between 0900 and 1700 on all days except Sundays and holidays, and between 0900 and 1200 on Saturdays. Such notice of readiness shall be delivered when vessel is in the loading or discharging berth if vacant, failing which from a lay berth or anchorage within limits of the port...

(c) Following receipt of notice of readiness laytime will commence at 0800 on the next day not excepted from laytime unless sooner commenced....

19(c) Vessel is to be discharged at the average rate of 1,750 metric tons ... per weather working day of twenty-four (24) consecutive hours (weather permitting), Saturdays after noon, Sundays and Holidays excepted on the basis of the Bill of Lading weight.

(d) ... Laytime non-reversible.

  1. Demurrage at loading and/or discharging ports is to be paid at the rate of US$7,500.00 per day or pro rata for part of a day … Despatch money to be paid by Owners at half the demurrage rate for all laytime saved at loading and/or discharging ports.

Any time lost for which Charterers / Receivers are responsible, which is not excepted under this Charterparty, shall count as laytime, until same has expired, thence time on demurrage.

21(a)(iii) If the vessel shifts from the anchorage or waiting place outside the port limits either directly to the first loading or discharging berth or to a lay berth or anchorage within the port limits the cost of that shifting shall be for Owners’ account and time so used shall not count even if vessel is on demurrage.

(iv) Cost of shifting from lay berth or anchorage within the port limits to first loading or first discharging berth to be for Owners’ account, time not counting.

22 If required, the Master to give free use of vessel’s cargo gear, and/or discharge equipment, also including runners, ropes and slings as on board, and power to operate the same.... Time lost pro rata to the number of gear / equipment inoperative or unavailable whether on account of breakdowns or non-availability of vessel’s gear essential to the loading or discharging of this cargo is not to count as laytime or time on demurrage …

30 … or if the cargo cannot be discharged by reason of Riots, Civil Commotions, or of a Strike or Lock-out of any class of workmen essential to the discharge, the time for … discharging …. shall not count during the continuance of such causes, … In case of any delay by reason of the before mentioned causes, no claim for damages or demurrage shall be made by the Charterers / Receivers of the cargo or Owners of the vessel. For the purpose, however, of settling despatch rebate accounts, any time lost by the vessel through any of the above causes shall be counted s time used in the loading, or discharging, as the case may be.

45(b) … All disputes arising out of this contract shall be arbitrated at London Montreal and, unless the parties agree forthwith on a single Arbitrator, be referred to the final arbitrament of two Arbitrators … one to be appointed by each of the parties, with a third to be selected by the two so appointed, who shall act as Chairman of the Tribunal. Such arbitration to be conducted in accordance with the Rules of Procedure of The Association of Maritime Arbitrators of Canada. … Any disputes arising hereunder shall be governed by English Law. Canadian Maritime Law and the laws of the province of Quebec as they may apply.

52 Owners acknowledge that discharge to be effected by vacuvators to be obtained locally at discharge port and undertake to rent and to supply sufficient (but always minimum 5 units) vacuvators together with power to operate same capable of discharging at charter-party rate of discharge. All costs to be for Owners’ account.

NOTICE OF READINESS

 

M.V. "LUCKY CHARM" PORT OF TEMA, GHANA

DATE: 3 MAY 2000

 

TO: MESSRS FATIMA BIBI & CO

COPY: MESSRS GOLDEN GAIN AGENCY (as agents only)

 

DEAR SIRS:

THIS IS TO ADVISE YOU THAT THE ABOVE VESSEL UNDER MY COMMAND ARRIVED AT THE PORT OF TEMA, GHANA AT 1115 HOURS LOCAL TIME TODAY, 3RD MAY 2000, AND IS IN ALL RESPECTS READY TO COMMENCE DISCHARGING ABOUT 17,634 METRIC TONS OF CANADIAN WHEAT IN BULK ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CHARTER PARTY DATED 22 MARCH 2000 AT MONTREAL.

 

THIS IS A WRITTEN CONFIRMATION OF NOTICE OF READINESS TRANSMITTED TO YOU BY RADIO AT 1115 HOURS TODAY, RECEIPT OF WHICH YOU HAVE ACKNOWLEDGED.

 

YOURS FAITHFULLY,

 

 

ALESSANDRO GIANCOMETTI,

MASTER

 

 

 

NOTICE OF READINESS ACCEPTED TODAY, 3 MAY 2000, AT 1115 HOURS, BUT ALWAYS SUBJECT TO PROOF THAT VESSEL IS IN EVERY WAY READY AND FIT FOR DISCHARGE AS PER C/P

 

FATIMA BIBI & CO

per DIOGENES LAERTES BIBI,

Managing Director

 

 

 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS

 

m.v. LUCKY CHARM Discharging 17,634 MT Canadian Wheat at

Tin Pot Wharf, TEMA, Ghana

________________________________________________________________

Arrived/anchored 1115 hours 3 May, 2000

Notice of Readiness tendered 1115 hours 3 May, 2000

Berth available 1610 hours 8 May, 2000

Weighed anchor 1630 hours 8 May, 2000

Berthed Tin Pot Wharf 1830 hours 8 May, 2000

Free Patique granted 1920 hours 8 May, 2000

Commenced discharge 0915 hours 10 May, 2000

Completed discharge 0940 hours 27 May, 2000

Departed berth 1150 hours 27 May, 2000

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

WORKING LOG

Day

Date

Time

Event

Wednesday

3/5/00

1115

Vessel anchored: berth occupied by m.v. "FIDELIO"

 

 

1115

Notice of Readiness tendered

Thursday

4/5/00

 

At anchor

Friday

5/5/00

 

At anchor

Saturday

6/5/00

 

At anchor

Sunday

7/5/00

 

At anchor

Monday

8/5/00

1550

Pilot on board

 

 

1610

m.v. "FIDELIO" departed berth

 

 

1630

Weighed anchor

 

 

1830

All fast alongside berth

 

 

1920

Free Pratique granted

Tuesday

9/5/00

 

At berth: no discharge due to lack of vacuvators

Wednesday

10/5/00

0805

3 vacuvators received on board

0915

Vacuvators ready: commenced discharge

1800

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

1930

Resumed discharge

Thursday

11/5/00

0330

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

0730

Resumed discharge

1800

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

1930

Resumed discharge

Friday

12/5/00

0330

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

0730

Resumed discharge

1800

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

1930

Resumed discharge

Saturday

13/5/00

0330

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

0730

Resumed discharge

1800

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

Sunday

14/5/00

0800

Resumed discharge

1700

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

Monday

15/5/00

0730

Resumed discharge

1800

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

1930

Resumed discharge

Tuesday

16/5/00

0330

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

0730

Resumed discharge

1800

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

1930

Resumed discharge

Wednesday

17/5/00

0330

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

0730

Resumed discharge

1800

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

1930

Resumed discharge

Thursday

18/5/00

0330

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

0730

Resumed discharge

1800

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

1930

Resumed discharge

Friday

19/5/00

0330

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

0730

Resumed discharge

1630

Discharge suspended (strike)

Saturday

20/5/00

No work: strike

Sunday

21/5/00

No work: strike

Monday

22/5/00

No work: strike

Tuesday

23/5/00

No work: strike

Wednesday

24/5/00

No work: strike

Thursday

25/5/00

No work: strike

Friday

26/5/00

1200

Strike ended: discharge resumed

1800

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

1930

Resumed discharge

Saturday

27/5/00

0330

Discharge suspended (end of shift)

0730

Resumed discharge

0940

Discharge completed

1130

Pilot on board

1150

Left berth

Note:

Normal working hours: Weekend working hours (overtime):

Day Shift: 0730 - 1800 Saturday: 1200 - 1800

Night Shift: 1930 - 0330 Sunday/holiday: 0800 - 1700

Saturday: 0730 - 1200

 

 

Signed / accepted: Alessandro T. B. di Giancometti

Master

Diogenes Laertes Bibi Coriolanus Smith

Fatima Bibi & Co. Golden Gain Agency

(Receiver) (Agent)

 

Tema, 27 May 2000

 

[A]

OWNERS’ LAYTIME STATEMENT

m.v. "LUCKY CHARM"

Discharge at Tema

 

Day / Date

 

Time

 

Time to count

Laytime used

Demurrage

Wed. 3/5

1115

Vessel arrived,

tendered NOR

0 - 00 - 00

0 - 00 - 00

Thurs. 4/5

0800

Laytime commences

0 - 16 - 00

0 - 16 - 00

Fri. 5/5

 

 

1 - 00 - 00

1 - 16 - 00

 

Sat. 6/5

 

 

0 - 12 - 00

2 - 04 - 00

 

Sun. 7/5

 

 

0 - 00 - 00

2 - 04 - 00

 

Mon. 8/5

1630

Commenced shifting

0 - 16 - 30

2 - 20 - 30

 

 

1830

Berthed,

awaiting vacuvators

0 - 00 - 00

2 - 20 - 30

 

Tues. 9/5

 

Awaiting vacuvators

0 - 00 - 00

2 - 20 - 30

 

Wed. 10/5

0915

Commenced discharge

0 - 14 - 45

3 - 11 - 15

 

Thurs. 11/5

 

 

1 - 00 - 00

4 - 11 - 15

 

Fri. 12/5

 

 

1 - 00 - 00

5 - 11 - 15

 

Sat. 13/5

 

 

0 - 12 - 00

5 - 23 - 15

 

Sun. 14/5

 

 

0 - 00 - 00

5 - 23 - 15

 

Mon. 15/5

 

 

1 - 00 - 00

6 - 23 - 15

 

Tues. 16/5

 

 

1 - 00 - 00

7 - 23 - 15

 

Wed. 17/5

 

 

1 - 00 - 00

8 - 23 - 15

 

Thurs. 18/5

1 - 00 - 00

9 - 23 - 15

Fri. 19/5

0235

Laytime expires

0 - 02 - 35

10 - 01 - 50

0235

Vessel on demurrage

0 - 21 - 25

0 - 21 - 25

Sat. 20/5

1 - 00 - 00

1 - 21 - 25

Sun. 21/5

1 - 00 - 00

2 - 21 - 25

Mon. 22/5

1 - 00 - 00

3 - 21 - 25

Tues. 23/5

1 - 00 - 00

4 - 21 - 25

Wed. 24/5

1 - 00 - 00

5 - 21 - 25

Thurs. 25/5

1 - 00 - 00

6 - 21 - 25

Fri. 26/5

1 - 00 - 00

7 - 21 - 25

Sat. 27/5

0940

Discharge completed

0 - 09 - 40

8 - 07 - 05

Cargo: 17,634 metric tons

Terms: 1,750 MT/ WWD SHEX (also Saturday p.m. excluded)

Time allowed: 17,634 metric tons = 10.076571 days = 10 days 1 hour 50 minutes

1,750 metric tons / day

 

Demurrage (due Owners): 8.295139 days @ $7,500 / day = $62,213.54

[B]

CHARTERERS’ LAYTIME STATEMENT

m.v. "LUCKY CHARM"

Discharge at Tema

 

 

Day / Date

 

Time

 

Time to count

Laytime used

Wed. 10/5

0915

Commenced discharge

0 - 14 - 45

0 - 14 - 45

Thurs. 11/5

 

 

1 - 00 - 00

1 - 14 - 45

Fri. 12/5

 

 

1 - 00 - 00

2 - 14 - 45

Sat. 13/5

 

 

0 - 12 - 00

3 - 02 - 45

Sun. 14/5

 

 

0 - 00 - 00

3 - 02 - 45

Mon. 15/5

 

 

1 - 00 - 00

4 - 02 - 45

Tues. 16/5

 

 

1 - 00 - 00

5 - 02 - 45

Wed. 17/5

 

 

1 - 00 - 00

6 - 02 - 45

Thurs. 18/5

1 - 00 - 00

7 - 02 - 45

Fri. 19/5

1630

Work suspended: strike

0 - 16 - 30

7 - 19 - 15

Sat. 20/5

Work suspended: strike

0 - 00 - 00

7 - 19 - 15

Sun. 21/5

Work suspended: strike

0 - 00 - 00

7 - 19 - 15

Mon. 22/5

Work suspended: strike

0 - 00 - 00

7 - 19 - 15

Tues. 23/5

Work suspended: strike

0 - 00 - 00

7 - 19 - 15

Wed. 24/5

Work suspended: strike

0 - 00 - 00

7 - 19 - 15

Thurs. 25/5

Work suspended: strike

0 - 00 - 00

7 - 19 - 15

Fri. 26/5

1200

Discharge resumed

0 - 12 - 00

8 - 07 - 15

Sat. 27/5

0940

Discharge completed

0 - 09 - 40

8 - 16 - 55

 

Time allowed: 17,634 / 1,750 = 10.076571 days

Adjust for 3 / 5 vacuvators available for discharge: 10.076571 x 5/3 = 16.794286 days

Adjusted laytime allowed = 16 days 19 hours 1 minute

Less laytime actually used 8 days 16 hours 55 minutes

Laytime saved = 8 days 2 hours 6 minutes

Despatch (due Charterers): 8.0875 days @ $3,750 = $30,328.13

 

 

[C]

OWNERS’ RESTATEMENT OF

CHARTERERS’ LAYTIME STATEMENT

(Made Without Prejudice to Owners’ Main Argument)

m.v. "LUCKY CHARM"

Discharge at Tema

 

 

Day / Date

 

Time

 

Time to count

Adjusted * time to count

Laytime used

Wed. 10/5

0915

Commenced discharge

 

1800

Discharge suspended

0 - 08 - 45

0 - 05 - 15

0 - 05 - 15

 

1930

Discharge resumed

0 - 01 - 30

0 - 01 - 30

0 - 06 - 45

 

2400

 

0 - 04 - 30

0 - 02 - 42

0 - 09 - 27

Thurs. 11/5

0330

Discharge suspended

0 - 03 - 30

0 - 02 - 06

0 - 11 - 33

 

0730

Discharge resumed

0 - 04 - 00

0 - 04 - 00

0 - 15 - 33

 

1800

Discharge suspended

0 - 10 - 30

0 - 06 - 18

0 - 21 - 51

 

1930

Discharge resumed

0 - 01 - 30

0 - 01 - 30

0 - 23 - 21

 

2400

 

0 - 04 - 30

0 - 02 - 42

1 - 02 - 03

Fri. 12/5

0330

Discharge suspended

0 - 03 - 30

0 - 02 - 06

1 - 04 - 09

 

0730

Discharge resumed

0 - 04 - 00

0 - 04 - 00

1 - 08 - 09

1800

Discharge suspended

0 - 10 - 30

0 - 06 - 18

1 - 14 - 27

 

1930

Discharge resumed

0 - 01 - 30

0 - 01 - 30

1 - 15 - 57

 

2400

 

0 - 04 - 30

0 - 02 - 42

1 - 18 - 39

Sat. 13/5

0330

Discharge suspended

0 - 03 - 30

0 - 02 - 06

1 - 20 - 45

0730

Discharge resumed

0 - 04 - 00

0 - 04 - 00

2 - 00 - 45

 

1200

Saturday p.m. excepted

0 - 04 - 30

0 - 02 - 42

2 - 03 - 27

Sun. 14/5

 

Sunday excepted

0 - 00 - 00

0 - 00 - 00

2 - 03 - 27

Mon. 15/5

0730

Discharge resumed

0 - 07 - 30

0 - 07 - 30

2 - 10 - 57

 

1800

Discharge suspended

0 - 10 - 30

0 - 06 - 18

2 - 17 - 15

 

1930

Discharge resumed

0 - 01 - 30

0 - 01 - 30

2 - 18 - 45

 

2400

 

0 - 04 - 30

0 - 02 - 42

2 - 21 - 27

Tues. 16/5

0330

Discharge suspended

0 - 03 - 30

0 - 02 - 06

2 - 23 - 33

0730

Discharge resumed

0 - 04 - 00

0 - 04 - 00

3 - 03 - 33

 

1800

Discharge suspended

0 - 10 - 30

0 - 06 - 18

3 - 09 - 51

1930

Discharge resumed

0 - 01 - 30

0 - 01 - 30

3 - 11 - 21

 

2400

 

0 - 04 - 30

0 - 02 - 42

3 - 14 - 03

Wed. 17/5

0330

Discharge suspended

0 - 03 - 30

0 - 02 - 06

3 - 16 - 09

0730

Discharge resumed

0 - 04 - 00

0 - 04 - 00

3 - 20 - 09

1800

Discharge suspended

0 - 10 - 30

0 - 06 - 18

4 - 02 - 27

1930

Discharge resumed

0 - 01 - 30

0 - 01 - 30

4 - 03 - 57

2400

0 - 04 - 30

0 - 02 - 42

4 - 06 - 39

Thurs. 18/5

0330

Discharge suspended

0 - 03 - 30

0 - 02 - 06

4 - 08 - 45

0730

Discharge resumed

0 - 04 - 00

0 - 04 - 00

4 - 12 - 45

1800

Discharge suspended

0 - 10 - 30

0 - 06 - 18

4 - 19 - 03

1930

Discharge resumed

0 - 01 - 30

0 - 01 - 30

4 - 20 - 33

2400

0 - 04 - 30

0 - 02 - 42

4 - 23 - 15

Fri. 19/5

0330

Discharge suspended

0 - 03 - 30

0 - 02 - 06

5 - 01 - 21

0730

Discharge resumed

0 - 04 - 00

0 - 04 - 00

5 - 05 - 21

1630

Work suspended: strike

0 - 09 - 00

0 - 05 - 24

5 - 10 - 45

Sat. 20/5

No work: strike

0 - 00 - 00

0 - 00 - 00

5 - 10 - 45

Sun. 21/5

No work: strike

0 - 00 - 00

0 - 00 - 00

5 - 10 - 45

Mon. 22/5

No work: strike

0 - 00 - 00

0 - 00 - 00

5 - 10 - 45

Tues. 23/5

No work: strike

0 - 00 - 00

0 - 00 - 00

5 - 10 - 45

Wed. 24/5

No work: strike

0 - 00 - 00

0 - 00 - 00

5 - 10 - 45

Thurs. 25/5

No work: strike

0 - 00 - 00

0 - 00 - 00

5 - 10 - 45

Fri. 26/5

1200

Discharge resumed

1800

Discharge suspended

0 - 06 - 00

0 - 03 - 36

5 - 14 - 21

1930

Discharge resumed

0 - 01 - 30

0 - 01 - 30

5 - 15 - 51

2400

0 - 04 - 30

0 - 02 - 42

5 - 18 - 33

Sat. 27/5

0330

Discharge suspended

0 - 03 - 30

0 - 02 - 06

5 - 20 - 39

0730

Discharge resumed

0 - 04 - 00

0 - 04 - 00

6 - 00 - 39

0940

Discharge completed

0 - 02 - 10

0 - 01 - 18

6 - 01 - 57

* Time used x 3 / 5

 

 

Time allowed: 10 days 1 hour 50 minutes

Adjusted time used: 6 days 1 hour 57minutes

Laytime saved: 3 days 23 hours 53 minutes

 

 

Despatch (due Charterers): 3.995139 days @ $3,750 = $ 14,981.77

 

 

 

 

 

[D]

WITNESS STATEMENT

 

Captain Alessandro Tullio Buonamente di Giancometti will swear and state as follows:

 

  1. My name is Alessandro Tullio Giancometti of 103, Via Ponchielli, Naples, Italy.
  2. My age is 42 years. I first obtained my Master’s foreign-going licence in 1985.

  3. I have been one of two Masters allocated to the "LUCKY CHARM" since my owners purchased the vessel in 1997. At the time of the Atlantic Grain Factors voyage, I had been on board as Master for about 4 months.
  4. I first learned of the charter to Atlantic Grain Factors through a telephone conversation with Captain Rasselas from my owners’ office in Greece at the end of March 2000. At that stage, the actual C/P had not been written up, and the owners sent me a copy of the recapitulation message from the brokers together with an older charter on which the charter party was to be based.
  5. At that time, my vessel was proceeding up the east coast of the USA in ballast. The owners told me to proceed directly to Quebec City to load a cargo of grain for discharge in West Africa. I later learned that the discharge port was to be Tema in Ghana. I was given instruction to send regular ETA notices to Receivers, Fatima Bibi & Co.
  6. The loading of the vessel went well and without any problems. We sailed for West Africa on 15 April. During the voyage, we lost some time due to breakdown of the main engine; but once that was fixed, we made up a day or two, and arrived off Tema on 3 May. All ETA’s were sent in good time to Receivers.
  7. At that time, the berth was occupied by another ship, the "FIDELIO" as the agent later told me. On the morning of 8th May (Monday), the agent told me that she would leave later that day, and we must be ready to come into berth. This was done, and the pilot was ordered for around 4 o’clock in the afternoon. He boarded in time, and we proceeded straight away to the harbour.
  8. My ship was all fast alongside at 6.30 p.m., and free pratique was granted about an hour later. But we could not commence discharge because we had on board no vacuvators, which are old-fashioned machines for sucking the grain cargo out of the holds. This was very upsetting for me, because it was my job to get these machines for the owners.
  9. On the passage across the Atlantic, Captain Rasselas had told me that we would need to rent these vacuvators locally at Tema, and I was to arrange this through the agent. This was the Charterers’ agent, named Golden Gain Agency, with head office in Takoradi and branch office in Tema.
  10. I had contacted this agent by telephone when passing the Azores and told him he must obtain 5 vacuvator machines to put on board as soon as we arrive at Tema. He said he would do this, and informed me that all vacuvators are to be rented from one supplier, name of Abu Hassan Bibi. I ask him if this company related to Receivers, and he tells me: Yes and No: they share the same office, and managing director of Receivers is brother of general manager of vacuvator supplier (same father, different mothers). But each business keeps separate bank accounts. Brothers good friends, he says, but fight often.
  11. When we anchored at Tema, I ask the agent (whose name was Mr Coriolanus Smith): where are my vacuvators? He tells me that they are being used by the FIDELIO, but will soon be available for LUCKY CHARM, as soon as we berth in its place. So I ask him: whose cargo is on FIDELIO? And he says Fatima Bibi’s, same as us. Everyday we waited at anchor he tells me the same thing: vacuvators ready on arrival in berth.
  12. When we get to the berth on the evening of 8 May, no vacuvators are provided. Mr Smith, the agent, tells me he does not know why; but this is Tema, and he will diligently investigate first thing tomorrow.
  13. The next morning, I heard the same story, so I told the agent to fetch the head man of the vacuvator company to tell me in person exactly what is going on. This gentleman was a very large person who smiled a lot, with a bright green shiny shirt and many gold chains about his neck and wrists and rings on every finger. He tells me I must not worry, as these things always happen in that place. The Receivers will understand, of course, and know the problem very well, which is for routine maintenance of his machines; and he, Abu Hassan Bibi himself, will see that everything is ready for tomorrow early to start the work on the ship.
  14. I reminded him that we must have 5 units immediately. This was what I had ordered, and he had confirmed his acceptance to the agent. He nodded his agreement to this, but then replied that, to be perfectly frank and honest, the Receiver had told him only 3 were needed, and so that was all that he had held for us in his shed. But he would speak to the Receivers and make everything all right for us, adding all sorts of nonsense about good business relations etc etc.
  15. At his request, I gave this Mr (Vacuvator) Bibi six of my best Cuban cigars, several cartons of cigarettes plus 8 bottles of whisky, and then he left. I asked the agent what was really going on, and he told me that there was serious trouble in the town with food shortage and also not enough trucks in the port because of vandalism and national shortage of gasoline. He said he had heard a rumour that in fact the Receivers could not obtain any trucks at all for LUCKY CHARM’s cargo until the next morning.
  16. The next day, Mr (Vacuvator) Bibi came back on board, very pleased with himself, to tell me he had three first-rate vacuvators in his truck (he called it a "lorry") on the quay, all ready to start work. As soon as I would pay him a small deposit of $20,000 (US), everything will begin.
  17. I asked him where were the other two machines I had ordered. He looked less pleased, and said that they were still in his shop for overhaul. But I should not worry so much, as the Receivers really only wanted enough cargo each day for the lorries to load. If I really understood this situation, I and my no doubt lovely wife would have very good reason to appreciate their good old-fashioned un-neo-colonial approach to the business.
  18. When I asked him to explain exactly what he meant by this, he got very angry and told me I must mind my own business. He would look after the vacuvators, and I must look after my ship and the cargo. That was the proper way of working at Tema, and I must be more careful with my slanderous accusations.
  19. The three vacuvators supplied were in fact in quite good condition, and the discharging of the cargo went well. According to my calculations, we were able to discharge the wheat at a rate of about 100 tons per working hour, which was quite good, especially as the charter party laytime rate was only about 75 tons.
  20. I did not believe Mr (Vacuvator) Bibi, and was convinced that he was simply operating under instruction of his brother, the other Mr Bibi (Receiver). Everything the agent told me in his long stay on board confirmed my suspicions: here was a clear set-up, designed to blackmail honest foreign shipowners.
  21. The next day, I had another visit from Mr (Vacuvator) Bibi. He had come, so he said, to correct any unfortunate misunderstanding caused during yesterday’s conversation. He could tell immediately that I was an honest captain, and I must have known that he was under much personal stress. In fact, to be perfectly frank and honest, he had quarreled with his brother and his sons about the extra two vacuvators; but facts were facts; and they were all in pieces on the floor of his shed. Meanwhile, his chief fitter had that very morning absconded up-country with the petty cash box and certain essential tools, and so there was not much he could do to help me.
  22. Perhaps, he suggested, I should contact my owners, explain to them very clearly how matters now stood, and suggest to them that a P&I guarantee or letter of credit for $100,000 might help. Very soon, he happened to know, the Receivers would visit me with a claim for shortage or damage to the cargo; and it would be a great pity if the ship was to be delayed on that account.
  23. I pointed out to him that, as the discharge had only just begun, any shortage claim might be a little premature, and as for wetting of the cargo, the hatch survey had shown no evidence of sea-water ingress or sweat. He then flew into a great rage and said I was a foolish man who did not comprehend any part of the business: he would complain to my owners about me. I invited him to do just that, which did not improve his temper at all.
  24. After long exchanges of this sort, Mr Bibi left the ship and said he would bring his brother, the Receiver, to explain matters to me more clearly. Meanwhile, I could absolutely trust him: the missing two vacuvators would be on board in time to assist with the discharge, and all would be well – provided I listened carefully to his brother.
  25. Mr Receiver – by name Diogenes Laertes Bibi - arrived late the following evening, and invited me to open a nice new bottle of my best bonded whisky. He apologised at great length for his brother, a paltry vacuvator salesman, he called him, a fickle fabricator of fantastic fairy-tales. A low, common sort of person, he added: even his mother was ashamed of him. Unfortunately, such riff-raff was all one could expect today in such a pathetic, woe-begotten, flea-bitten outpost of the dark continent (his words).
  26. This Mr D.L. Bibi was quite unlike his brother, being rather small and wearing a black tie and bowler hat, gold-rimmed spectacles on a gold chain round his neck and many gold fillings in rather protruding teeth. He spoke very quickly and abruptly, and punctuated his remarks with flourishes of his bamboo cane, which had many gold bands on the handle. He confided that he just happened to know that our missing two vacuvators were at that very moment being charged out to two other vessels in the port, although they were in fact lying in pieces on the mud floor of his brother’s fire-trap of a shed. He himself had seen to it that my owners were not being charged as well, because he could tell that we were honest businessmen who understood very well which end of the bottle to pour out of. (He clearly understood this also, I realised, as I watched him rapidly depleting my best single malt.)
  27. As he left the vessel still brandishing his cane ( I had to arrange for a cargo sling to be attached to the storing crane so that he might safely reach the quay), Mr Diogenes Bibi assured me that all would undoubtedly turn out for the best: there would soon be a wonderful abundance of lorries and then I would hardly believe my eyes as I beheld how magnificently all five vacuvators would discharge my owners’ beautiful ship.
  28. Every day after that, I complained to the agent, to the Receivers and to the vacuvator supplier; but nothing changed. The three vacuvator machines continued to achieve a very fair production, and a new truck always seemed to roll onto the quay just in time to avoid any delays. This went on until the food riots in the town and the port strike, which started on the next Friday.
  29. After the strike ended on the Friday after that (26th May), we resumed our operation in much the same way until the morning of the 27th, when discharge was almost complete. Then, at about 0800, the two Bibi bothers clambered up the gangway and arrived unannounced on the bridge. Mr Abu Hassan was very out of breath from his exertions; but his brother eagerly pressed me to partake breakfast with them in my cabin. I reluctantly agreed, and arranged for the meal.
  30. They did not waste time in pleasantries. The two missing vacuvators were on the quay, and could absolutely be placed on board not less than 5 minutes prior to completion of discharge. If only I would give them some appropriate sign of appreciation, Mr Bibi (Receiver) would sign a certificate to confirm that there had indeed been "5 vacuvators on board during discharge", and so my owners could easily claim demurrage from the Charterers. (By "appropriate", it turned out that they meant a sum of not less than $25,000 US in $100 bills.)
  31. I told them that this was out of the question, and that, if my vessel was detained in any way, I would go straight to the court and expose their silly scheme. They then became very angry with me (and with one another also) and left in great haste without touching their poached eggs, the large fat one tripping and falling off the gangway about two thirds of the way down: fortunately, the angle was not too great and he landed on his brother, so he was not seriously hurt, otherwise no doubt he would have sued us.
  32. I did not see either of these gentlemen again. We completed discharge at 0940 that morning, and sailed without further incident or interference. The pilot told me that this sort of thing happens quite often: there is even a special word for it in the local dialect.
  33. We never did receive the two missing vacuvators. But Captain Rasselas told me later in the office that the agent had tried to charge us for them anyway.

 

 

 

Signed: Alessandro T. B. di Giancometti (Master Mariner)

Witness: Clodia Desdemona Martucci (Secretary)

Naples, 21 April, 2001